Friday, April 17, 2009

"Antonios is a worthy champion": Srinath



On Wednesday (April 15), a friend called me to say, "Jockey Srinath is very upset about the way people are reacting after Set Alight's loss in the Derby. Would you lke to speak to him?" "Sure," said I, "give me his phone number." 

This article is based on the talk I had with the ace jockey--only, I have put it in the first-person version so that readers can have a feel of Srinath directly talking to them on one-on-one basis.

By Y S Srinath

When I was at the track yesterday morning, a senior racegoer who is pally with professionals asked me, "So tell me, by how many lengths would you have won if you were riding Set Alight?" "Are you out of your mind?," I shot back, "what makes you think she could have won?" 

A colleague then told me that a huge controversy had developed over the last 48 hours about Malesh Narredu's handling of Set Alight, in the press and on internet forums, and suggested I should read all about it. And now, after reading the stuff, all I can say is that I am absolutely disgusted! Every idiot who does not understand racing and riding has used and abused the freedom of expression, sadly, under the cover of anonymity that the internet offers, in vilifying the man (Narredu) who rode one of the best races under the circumstances. 

I should know, because I was in the race, riding Oaks winner Riyasat, and I have also watched the video a number of times. Here is my reading of the race. 

First, Set Alight was a bit too hyper in the paddock parade. Maybe the heat and the crowd, in a way, got to her. She jumped smartly, but was too keen, almost in a hurry! In the video you can see her mouth was open for the first couple of furlongs and she didn't want to be restrained. It was as if she wanted to get over and done with this race as soon as possible. I think Malesh did a splendid job in that he still managed to calm and settle her well, although I am sure no jockey would like to be so close to the pace in a mile-and-a-half race. But then, the last thing a jockey wants is to antagonize a strong-willed horse.

I had settled Riyasat way off the pace and I was having a good look at all the runners ahead of me, and especially Set Alight and Autonomy, who were perceived as the main two contenders. After the halfway mark, Autonomy hurriedly improved and got alongside Antonios who too had made steady progress from mid-bunch to be in striking position around the turn. 

At the final turn, I saw Abs Fabs and Go Guzzi Go, at the head of the pack, starting to fall back and a gap opened for Set Alight and Malesh. In retrospect, I think this was a crucial moment, and Malesh surely did the right thing by asking her to take that gap, and not stay with this duo who fell back so alarmingly, they finished in the last four. It is unfortunate that Set Alight, already very keen and impatient by this time, perhaps misinterpreted this signal (horses do it more often than you might think), and spurted ahead with such energy that I instantly had an inkling she could be collared near home if she spends all of it. And when I saw Antonios gaining momentum with every stride in the final furlong, I knew the result of the race. 

Later, when I watched the race on video, I realised what a worthy winner Antonios actually was. He had a rough passage, met with interference at an extremely crucial juncture before the turn, but still managed to unleash a terrific burst to win decisively by a length-and-a-half, and that too, in record time! I have no doubt if he had a clear passage, the margin would have been much bigger. 

The sorriest aspect of this whole, needless controversy is that in all the noise made by people who are clearly talking through their pockets, racing fraternity has missed a great opportunity to applaud a real hero, Antonios, and his connections--owners and especially the trainer, whose hard work, toil and training made it possible for a 50 to 1 shot to get into the Derby scroll of honour.

9 comments:

  1. Dear Mr.Gosavi,

    You are a good man with good intentions. Don't fall prey to these interviews. There are too many wheels within wheels.

    If you feel it makes any sense please do ask some of the people you know and whom I will mention some questions if you feel its worth your time.

    1) Very basic question. Why is Srinath feeling so upset about people talking nonsense (if it is nonsense) about Narredu? Before Srinath defends Narredu please do take the time and ask Mr.Mistry and C.D.Katrak what they think iof the ride Srinath has given to Riyasat.

    Instead of looking at all the other horses in the race if he may have chosen to concentrate on his riding instructions he might have ridden a better race.

    It is no secret that Srianth had been given the ride on Natonios by Mr.Shah and though he pleaded with Mr. Mistry he was not given permission to ride the horse. Then like a spoilt schoolboy he rode Riyast contrary to instructions.

    2) We are not idiots as Srinath accuses us to be. He is an idiot for thinking the entire racing fraternity is full of idiots. We do not talk through our pockets as the filly ran at 40/100 so what bets are we going to play? The money collected on a Derby fav like this is of the ocassional punter who is one of the 25000 who drop by on such days. They do not make accusations they go home quietly after losing!!! I think it is him who is talking throgh his helmet.

    3) It is nice that he was able see the race and come to conclusions after the race. We would have found it easier though if he would not have given this interview after reading Narredu's interview in the Hindustan Times though beacuse he uses the same words as him throughout most of his interview with you!!! Not only that he comes to the same conclusion that we all talk through our pockets!!!

    4) Let Srinath not be under any delusion as to what his and Mallesh's reputations are amongst Indian race go ers. Niether did we beileve mallesh in his interview in the Hinduatan Times and neither do we believe this man.

    It is amazing that they have the gall to say we talk through out pockets and you print it.

    What we think about both these jockeys Mr.Gosavi you probably know because chances are that you think about them in the same way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Mr Gosavi,

    The Srinath blog was a truly brilliant insight into the race. It was accurate and authentic. Thank you for the piece.

    I would however, request you to refrain from posting useless comments as the one before me and save us from the misery of idiotic and immature, but obvious attack on jockeys with mettle.


    The point is some idiots just want to vent thier personal ire or dislike to a prticular pro. The post of this "intellect" does not take any point made my Srinath as valid. nor does he post any counter view about Srinath's reading of the race and show what is it that he finds 'idiotic' in Srinath's analysis. Had he dared to argue Srinath's points it would have been interesting.

    This man or woman or whatever(anonimity of the net covers even the gender)has simply bellowed utter rubbish with the sole intent of spewing his personal dislike to the pro in question. I am sure that mallesh is certtainly not his favorite and anyone who supports mallesh's riding on SA is no intellect either according to him.

    Please refrain from posting such visibly personal frustrated crap of people unabashedly writing without substance only to serve his own purpose or of those he is eager to please.

    Mahendar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Mr Anonymous,

    Since you seem to be in the know about all the instructions that were being given to Riyaasat in the Indian derby, maybe you also know that the same filly ran and won the Indian Oaks 2 weeks prior following pretty much the same style of "switch off and challenge late" tactics.

    The fact that another horse, "Icebreaker" whom she beat in the Oaks has finished ahead of her in the derby, should prove to anyone how much difference a change in tactics(Icebreaker's) can make.

    In conclusion Mr Anonymous, I am left in no doubt after reading your post that YOU are most definately one of the idiots mentioned in the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi my dear supporters of Srinath,

    1) Yes i may be an idiot but i am not all alone am I ? The stewards have fined Mallesh 10000 rupees for riding the sort of race he did. So they are also idiots i suppose.

    2) Pesi said after the race that Mallesh rode a bad race so we could assume he is an idiot.

    3) The URBB group has decided not to get him to bangalore for the season so they are also idiots.

    But you two guys h are not idiots. Right?

    I asked if Mr.Gosavi could check if Srinath rode to instructions in the Derby, i maintain he did not. Till that is checked I suppose i will remain an idiot and you will be the smart ones.

    My anonymity is not the question your open support as his lackeys is.

    That you would want my voice to be turned off is proof enough that you are not open to any reason or logic yourself while you blame me for being an idiot.

    How about answering my questions instead??

    I have nothing against Srinath. He means nothing to me.But when he goes out telling race goers that we speak from our pockets (...part edited out... by moderator) . Having said that he doesnt have to worry about speaking through his pocket he can speak through his two mouth pieces.In stereo.!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr Gosavi your blog is excellent. Badly needed for the Indian punter. Very refreshing I will say.
    However, I dont agree with Srinath's view and I am sure no one will. It may not be malpractice but it was not the best ride. As someone before me pointed out this jockey is talking thro his helmet.
    Congratulations again on a very good site.

    ReplyDelete
  6. may i add my two bits to this interesting debate. Not just experts but even ordinary race goers could see how bad Narredu's ride was.

    Usman Rangeela in his article states that Mrs. Mallya said "who is that monkey riding the horse".


    Why has Srinath chosen to defend this poor ride? I agree with Mr.Anonymous that if what Srinath says is right then Pesi Shroff could have seen that too and would not have been critical of Narredu's ride.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr Gosavi this interview is very good. If nothing else it puts forward very well what can be called minority point of view. But may i ask you a question mr gosavi why are you shying away from giving your own personal opinion of the race? Where is your reading of the derby? I checked last weeks all middays and I have not found anything except the article on monday after the derby.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There are too many anonymous replies to this post, so for clarity, I will say Dear Mr Anonymous who has raised the question of why I am shying away from giving my opinion about the race. Well, sometime during the day when I have a little time, you will get to read my answer on the blog home page.

    Prakash

    ReplyDelete
  9. Everthing that Srinath said in the interview is perfect to the "T". But ,,,But words like..Are you out of your mind?," "what makes you think she(SA) could have won?" makes me wonder whether he(Sri)had a mind of his own in the first place.Its obvious that he sides Mallesh,for which jockey wouldn't... IF he was dishonest.No professional, whether trainer owner ,jockey, writer or tipster before the race, had the guts to look foolish enough to say what Srinathji said.The only assumption I can make of Sri statement is, probably he had an inkling of Set Alight --planned--loss as much as Mallesh did.

    ReplyDelete

Wish to post as "Anonymous"? Not a problem.
But a better way is to use the Name/URL option and take up some net name of your choice. That way your privacy is protected and other readers can associate your thoughts with your web personality. Think about it.
A sincere appeal by Prakash Gosavi, blog owner